Sunanda Krishna v. Ixia et al
||Laurent Asscher, Ilan Daskal, Jonathan Fram, Errol Ginsberg, Gail Hamilton, Ixia, Keysight Acquisitions, Inc, Keysight Technologies, Inc. and Bethany Mayer
||March 8, 2017
||US District Court for the Central District of California
||Alexander F. MacKinnon
||Manuel L. Real
|Nature of Suit:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|April 19, 2017
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a) 16 by Judge Manuel L. Real. Having considered the Stipulation of Dismissal submitted by Plaintiff Sunanda Krishna and Defendants, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Action is dismissed, and all claims asserted therein are dismissed with prejudice as to Plaintiff only. All claims on behalf of the putative class are dismissed without prejudice. 2. Because the dismissal is with pr ejudice as to Plaintiff only, and not on behalf of a putative class, notice of this dismissal is not required. 3. The Court retains jurisdiction of the Action solely for the purpose of determining Plaintiffs forthcoming Fee Application, if such Fee A pplication becomes necessary. 4. This Order is entered without prejudice to any right, position, claim or defense any party may assert with respect to the Fee Application, which includes the Defendants right to oppose the Fee Application. 5. To the extent that the parties are unable to reach an agreement concerning the Fee Application, they may contact the Court regarding a schedule and hearing to present such application to the Court. 6. Upon completion of briefing, the parties shall promptly contact the Court to schedule argument regarding Plaintiffs Fee Application at a time convenient to the Court. 7. This action is removed from the Courts active caseload until further application by the parties or Order of this Court. All pending dates are vacated by the Court. If the parties reach an agreement concerning the Fee Application, they will notify the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Case Terminated. Made JS-6.) (clee)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?