Michael Berry v. Eric Arnold et al
| Michael Berry |
| Eric Arnold and Attorney General Office |
| 2:2017cv02140 |
| March 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F. Eick |
| Manuel L. Real |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
JUDGMENT by Judge Manuel L. Real. Pursuant to the "Order of Dismissal," It is Adjudged that the First Amended Petition is denied and dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sp)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER DISMISSING PETITION WITH LEAVE TO AMEND by Judge Manuel L. Real, re Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254), 1 . The Petition is dismissed without prejudice. If Petitioner intends to pursue habeas corpus relief in the United States District Court for the Central District of California at this time, Petitioner shall file a First Amended Petition that utilizes the approved form. The First Amended Petition shall be complete in itself. It shall not refer in any manner to the original Petit ion. In other words, Petitioner must start over when preparing the First Amended Petition. The First Amended Petition shall contain a short and plain statement of the grounds for relief and the supporting facts. Failure to file a First Amended Petition within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute. (dml)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
