James McGuire v. Rexel Holdings USA Corp. et al
James McGuire |
DOES, General Supply and Services, Inc., Gexpro Services and Rexel Holdings USA Corp. |
2:2017cv02581 |
April 4, 2017 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dolly M. Gee |
Suzanne H. Segal |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Upon Stipulation 19 , the Court ORDERS that the action, and all claims alleged therein, are hereby dismissed in their entirety with prejudice. The parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. All scheduled dates and deadlines are VACATED. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk) |
Filing 15 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee. The Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before July 19, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed as to defendant Gexpro Services for lack of prosecution. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a written response on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed as to defendant Gexpro Services if a written response demonstrating good cause is not filed by the date indicated above. (iv) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.