Antony D. McLaurin v. Stu Sherman

Antony D. McLaurin v. Stu Sherman

Defendant:	Stu Sherman
Petitioner:	Anthony D. McLaurin
Case Number:	2:2017cv02831
Filed:	April 13, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Alka Sagar
Presiding Judge:	James V. Selna
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 5, 2018	Filing 43 JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna. Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge 42 , IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied and dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (afe)
June 30, 2017	Filing 19 MINUTE ORDER TO SHOW CUASE by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. Petitioner is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Court should not dismiss this action for failure to prosecute and/or obey a Court order. Petitioner must file a response to this Order no later tha n July 10, 2017. Petitioner may discharge of this Order to Show Cause by signing and returning page 8 of the Petition to the Court by July 10, 2017. The Court VACATES the portion of its June 5, 2017 Order requiring Respondent to file an Answer addressing the merits of the claims alleged in the Petition by no later than July 5, 2017. Once the issue of the signing and returning the Petition to the Court has been resolved, the Court will set another date for Respondent to file an Answer. (mz)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 5, 2018

Filing 43 JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna. Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge 42 , IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied and dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (afe)

June 30, 2017

Filing 19 MINUTE ORDER TO SHOW CUASE by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. Petitioner is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Court should not dismiss this action for failure to prosecute and/or obey a Court order. Petitioner must file a response to this Order no later tha n July 10, 2017. Petitioner may discharge of this Order to Show Cause by signing and returning page 8 of the Petition to the Court by July 10, 2017. The Court VACATES the portion of its June 5, 2017 Order requiring Respondent to file an Answer addressing the merits of the claims alleged in the Petition by no later than July 5, 2017. Once the issue of the signing and returning the Petition to the Court has been resolved, the Court will set another date for Respondent to file an Answer. (mz)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Antony D. McLaurin v. Stu Sherman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Anthony D. McLaurin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Stu Sherman
Represented By:	Toni R Johns Estaville
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?