The Board of Trustees of the Southern California Floor Covering Pension Trust Fund v. New Image Commercial Flooring Incorporated

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District The Board of Trustees of the Southern California Floor Covering Pension Trust Fund v. New Image Commercial Flooring Incorporated

The Board of Trustees of the Southern California Floor Covering Pension Trust Fund v. New Image Commercial Flooring Incorporated

Plaintiff:	The Board of Trustees of the Painters and Allied Trades Labor Management Cooperation Fund, The Board of Trustees of the Southern California Floor Covering Appenticeship and Training Trust Fund, The Board of Trustees of the Southern California Floor Covering Contract Administration Trust Fund, The Board of Trustees of the Southern California Floor Covering Health and Welfare Trust Fund, The Board of Trustees of the Southern California Floor Covering Pension Trust Fund and The Board of Trustees of the Southern California Floor Covering Vacation and Holiday Trust Fund
Defendant:	New Image Commercial Flooring Incorporated
Case Number:	2:2017cv02962
Filed:	April 19, 2017
Court:	U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Alexander F. MacKinnon
Presiding Judge:	Manuel L. Real
Nature of Suit:	Labor: E.R.I.S.A.

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 23, 2017	Filing 14 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Manuel L. Real. Plaintiff(s) is ordered to show cause in writing no later than September 6, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. In acc ordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, no oral argument on this Order to Show Cause will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Court's Order may result in the dismissal of the action. (iv)
July 7, 2017	Filing 10 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Manuel L. Real. Plaintiff(s) is ordered to show cause in writing no later than July 21, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. In accordan ce with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, no oral argument on this Order to Show Cause will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Court's Order will result in the dismissal of the action. (iv)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 23, 2017

Filing 14 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Manuel L. Real. Plaintiff(s) is ordered to show cause in writing no later than September 6, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. In acc ordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, no oral argument on this Order to Show Cause will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Court's Order may result in the dismissal of the action. (iv)

July 7, 2017

Filing 10 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Manuel L. Real. Plaintiff(s) is ordered to show cause in writing no later than July 21, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. In accordan ce with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, no oral argument on this Order to Show Cause will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Court's Order will result in the dismissal of the action. (iv)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: The Board of Trustees of the Southern California Floor Covering Pension Trust Fund v. New Image Commercial Flooring Incorporated
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: New Image Commercial Flooring Incorporated
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: The Board of Trustees of the Painters and Allied Trades Labor Management Cooperation Fund
Represented By:	Nicholas Isaac Starkman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: The Board of Trustees of the Southern California Floor Covering Appenticeship and Training Trust Fund
Represented By:	Nicholas Isaac Starkman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: The Board of Trustees of the Southern California Floor Covering Contract Administration Trust Fund
Represented By:	Nicholas Isaac Starkman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: The Board of Trustees of the Southern California Floor Covering Health and Welfare Trust Fund
Represented By:	Nicholas Isaac Starkman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: The Board of Trustees of the Southern California Floor Covering Pension Trust Fund
Represented By:	Nicholas Isaac Starkman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: The Board of Trustees of the Southern California Floor Covering Vacation and Holiday Trust Fund
Represented By:	Nicholas Isaac Starkman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?