In re Debtor Marci Boswell
| ASO, LLC |
| Marci Boswell |
| Marci Boswell |
| 2:2017cv03322 |
| May 2, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. On June 23, 2017, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to file required documents 10 . A written respon se to the Order to Show Cause was ordered to be filed no later than July 10, 2017. Noresponse having been filed to the Courts Order to Show Cause, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the above-entitled appeal is dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to file documents and for failure to comply with the orders of the Court, pursuant to Local Rule 41. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)
|
|
Filing
10
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING BANKRUPTCY APPEAL by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Appellant is Ordered to Show Cause no later than July 10, 2017, why the appeal should not be dismissed for these deficiencies. The Court may consider Appellant's filing of the missing required documents and fees, along with a declaration of good cause for the delay, sufficient response to the order to show cause. (iv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
