Blindlight, LLC v. Timothy Cubbison et al
| Blindlight, LLC |
| Timothy Cubbison, Does, Horseless Cowboy, LLC and Austin Snyder |
| Blindlight, LLC and Lev Chapelsky |
| Timothy Cubbison, Horseless Cowboy, LLC and Austin Snyder |
| 2:2017cv03497 |
| May 9, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L. Abrams |
| John A. Kronstadt |
| Other Fraud |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
117
ORDER ENTERING PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE by Judge John A. Kronstadt, 116 . Refer to the Court's order for details. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (pso)
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. On December 1, 2017, plaintiff filed an Ex Parte Application to Shorten Time ("Application" or "App.") (ECF No. 101 ) for a hearing on plaintiff's Motion to Compel pro duction of documents and further interrogatory responses from defendants ("Motion" or "Mot.") (ECF No. 102 ). Based on plaintiff's representation that defendants have failed to produce any documents in this action, especially in light of the issuance of a Protective Order nearly two months ago and the rapidly-approaching discovery cut-off date, NO LATER THAN 12:00 noon on DECEMBER 5, 2017, defendants are ordered to show cause: SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (ch)
|
|
Filing
99
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. 98 (ch)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
