Reseda Medical Clinic et al v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
| Darby Sherman Way, LLC and Reseda Medical Clinic |
| Does and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company |
| 2:2017cv03686 |
| June 13, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Michael R. Wilner |
| George H. Wu |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE by Judge George H. Wu: Based upon the Notice of Settlement filed on September 20, 2017 19 , it is hereby ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. (Case Terminated. Made JS-6.) (cr)
|
|
Filing
14
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge George H. Wu: The parties are currently scheduled to appear before this Court on July 13, 2017 for a scheduling conference. See Docket No. 13. The Court orders Liberty Mutual t o show cause in writing no later than July 6, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Liberty Mutual is reminded that courtesy copies are to be delivered to the Chambers. The Court will also entertain any argument the parties wish to present on the issue at the scheduling conference. Please refer to the Court's order for specifics. (cr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
