Phillip Dixon v. Central Financial Control
||Phillip Dixon, Jr
||Central Financial Control
||September 20, 2017
||US District Court for the Central District of California
||Western Division - Los Angeles Office
||Frederick F. Mumm
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|October 12, 2017
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Percy Anderson. the Court cautioned Plaintiff about the possibility of dismissal in the Court's September 20, 2017 Order. The Court finds that Plaintiff has abandoned this action. The Court therefore dismisses this action without prejudice for lack of prosecution. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (See document for details) (mrgo)
|September 20, 2017
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Percy Anderson. To date, Plaintiff has not filed a declaration as required by the Court's July 28 Order. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before October 2, 2017, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submiss ion without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiff's response. Failure to respond to this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions, including but not limited to dismissal of the complaint. See document for details. (smo)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?