Willie Clark v. Shawn Hatton

Willie Clark v. Shawn Hatton

Petitioner:	Willie Clark
Respondent:	Shawn, Hatton
Case Number:	2:2017cv05857
Filed:	August 8, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Alicia G. Rosenberg
Presiding Judge:	James V. Selna
Nature of Suit:	Other

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 27, 2017	Filing 9 JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna. Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 8 , IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition in this matter is denied and dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (kl)
August 29, 2017	Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. Petitioner, a state inmate, has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. For the reasons discussed below, it appears that the one -year statute of limitations has expired for the first three claims in the four-claim petition. It further appears that the fourth claim is subject to summary dismissal. The court therefore orders Petitioner to show cause on or before September 29, 2017 why the court should not recommend dismissal of the petition with prejudice. (See Order for details.) (mp)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 27, 2017

Filing 9 JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna. Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 8 , IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition in this matter is denied and dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (kl)

August 29, 2017

Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. Petitioner, a state inmate, has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. For the reasons discussed below, it appears that the one -year statute of limitations has expired for the first three claims in the four-claim petition. It further appears that the fourth claim is subject to summary dismissal. The court therefore orders Petitioner to show cause on or before September 29, 2017 why the court should not recommend dismissal of the petition with prejudice. (See Order for details.) (mp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Willie Clark v. Shawn Hatton
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Willie Clark
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Shawn, Hatton
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?