Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. City Fibers, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. City Fibers, Inc.

Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. City Fibers, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Los Angeles Waterkeeper
Defendant:	City Fibers, Inc.
Case Number:	2:2017cv05960
Filed:	August 10, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Andre Birotte
Presiding Judge:	Alicia G. Rosenberg
Nature of Suit:	Other

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 2, 2019	Filing 30 CONSENT DECREE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Stipulation 29 , it is the express purpose of the Settling Parties entering into this Consent Decree to further the objectives set forth in the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. Sections 1251, et seq., and to resolve those issues alleged by Plaintiff Los Angeles Waterkeeper ("Waterkeeper") in its Complaint that, among other things, City Fibers has repeatedly discharged polluted storm water. Defendant City Fibers, Inc. ("City Fibers") will pay the sum of $50,000 to the Rose Foundation for Communities and the Environment for the sole purpose of providing grants to environmentally beneficial projects in the Southern California Bight relating to water quality improvements. City Fibers shall reimburse Waterkeeper in the amount of one hundred and $135,000 to help defray Waterkeeper's reasonable investigation, expert, and attorneys' fees and costs, and all other reasonable costs incurred as a result of investiga ting the activities at the Facilities related to this Consent Decree, bringing these matters to City Fibers' attention, and negotiating a resolution of this action in the public interest. As reimbursement for Waterkeeper's future fees and c osts that will be incurred in order for Waterkeeper to monitor City Fibers' compliance with this Consent Decree and to effectively meet and confer and evaluate storm water monitoring results for the Facilities, City Fibers agrees to pay Waterkee per the amount of $20,000 for its costs to be incurred in overseeing the implementation of this Consent Decree. This Consent Decree shall terminate on 12/21/2021, or through the conclusion of any proceeding to enforce this Consent Decree initiat ed prior to 12/21/2021, or until the completion of any payment or affirmative duty required by this Consent Decree, whichever is the later occurrence. This Consent Decree constitutes a full and final settlement of this matter. See document re Commitments of City Fibers and Waterkeeper re maintenance, structural improvements, housekeeping, evaluation of infiltration, employee training, sampling, and other details. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (gk)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 2, 2019

Filing 30 CONSENT DECREE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Stipulation 29 , it is the express purpose of the Settling Parties entering into this Consent Decree to further the objectives set forth in the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. Sections 1251, et seq., and to resolve those issues alleged by Plaintiff Los Angeles Waterkeeper ("Waterkeeper") in its Complaint that, among other things, City Fibers has repeatedly discharged polluted storm water. Defendant City Fibers, Inc. ("City Fibers") will pay the sum of $50,000 to the Rose Foundation for Communities and the Environment for the sole purpose of providing grants to environmentally beneficial projects in the Southern California Bight relating to water quality improvements. City Fibers shall reimburse Waterkeeper in the amount of one hundred and $135,000 to help defray Waterkeeper's reasonable investigation, expert, and attorneys' fees and costs, and all other reasonable costs incurred as a result of investiga ting the activities at the Facilities related to this Consent Decree, bringing these matters to City Fibers' attention, and negotiating a resolution of this action in the public interest. As reimbursement for Waterkeeper's future fees and c osts that will be incurred in order for Waterkeeper to monitor City Fibers' compliance with this Consent Decree and to effectively meet and confer and evaluate storm water monitoring results for the Facilities, City Fibers agrees to pay Waterkee per the amount of $20,000 for its costs to be incurred in overseeing the implementation of this Consent Decree. This Consent Decree shall terminate on 12/21/2021, or through the conclusion of any proceeding to enforce this Consent Decree initiat ed prior to 12/21/2021, or until the completion of any payment or affirmative duty required by this Consent Decree, whichever is the later occurrence. This Consent Decree constitutes a full and final settlement of this matter. See document re Commitments of City Fibers and Waterkeeper re maintenance, structural improvements, housekeeping, evaluation of infiltration, employee training, sampling, and other details. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (gk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. City Fibers, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: City Fibers, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Los Angeles Waterkeeper
Represented By:	Douglas Jonathan Chermak
Represented By:	Melissa Lynn Kelly
Represented By:	Michael R Lozeau
Represented By:	Los Angeles Waterkeeper
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?