Suleyma Melendez v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Suleyma Melendez v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Suleyma Melendez v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Plaintiff:	Suleyma Melendez
Defendant:	Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number:	2:2017cv06270
Filed:	August 24, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	John D. Early
Presiding Judge:	George H. Wu
Nature of Suit:	Other

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 6, 2018	Filing 11 JUDGMENT by Judge George H. Wu: Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lwag)
December 4, 2017	Filing 7 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause by Magistrate Judge John D. Early. Plaintiff is therefore ORDERED to show good cause in writing by no later than December 29, 2017, why the Court should not recommend the dismissal this action pursuant to R ule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to timely serve process upon defendant. Plaintiff is advised that if she fails to file a response to this Order by December 29, 2017, the Court may also recommend the dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with a Court order. (see document for details). (dro)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 6, 2018

Filing 11 JUDGMENT by Judge George H. Wu: Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lwag)

December 4, 2017

Filing 7 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause by Magistrate Judge John D. Early. Plaintiff is therefore ORDERED to show good cause in writing by no later than December 29, 2017, why the Court should not recommend the dismissal this action pursuant to R ule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to timely serve process upon defendant. Plaintiff is advised that if she fails to file a response to this Order by December 29, 2017, the Court may also recommend the dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with a Court order. (see document for details). (dro)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Suleyma Melendez v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Suleyma Melendez
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?