Jose Alcala v. MXD Group, Inc.
Jose Alcala |
MXD Group, Inc. |
2:2017cv06553 |
September 6, 2017 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alka Sagar |
Otis D. Wright |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 46 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar re Stipulation for Protective Order 45 . *NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT* (afe) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jose Alcala v. MXD Group, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Jose Alcala | |
Represented By: | Joshua Geoffrey Konecky |
Represented By: | Nathan Bunnell Piller |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: MXD Group, Inc. | |
Represented By: | David D Kadue |
Represented By: | Richard Burk Lapp |
Represented By: | Eric Ghiya Ruehe |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.