Andre Lamar Revis v. The State of California

Petitioner: Andre Lamar Revis
Respondent: The State of California
Case Number: 2:2017cv06642
Filed: September 14, 2017
Court: California Central District Court
Office: Western Division - Los Angeles Office
Referring Judge: Paul L. Abrams
Presiding Judge: Philip S. Gutierrez
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 14, 2017 4 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER DISMISSING HABEAS PETITION AS SUCCESSIVE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. The Petition 1 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as successive. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (ch)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Andre Lamar Revis v. The State of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Andre Lamar Revis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: The State of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?