Omar Segura v. Sam Priyamal De Sylva et al
| Omar Segura |
| Sam Priyamal De Sylva, Does and The City of Pasadena |
| 2:2017cv08129 |
| November 7, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F. Eick |
| Christina A. Snyder |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - ORDER DISSMISSING PLAINTIFF'S SECTION 1983 AND BANE ACT CLAIMS AND REMANDING CASE by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court issued an Order to Show Cause ("OSC") as to why plaintiff's Section 1983 claim shoul d not be dismissed and the action remanded to state court. The Court DISMISSES plaintiff's third claim for violation of the Bane Act and eleventh claim for violation of 42 U.S.C. Section 1983, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1367(c)(4), and REMANDS the action to Los Angeles Superior Court, Case Number BC588933. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6 ) Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
|
|
Filing
9
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - Motion to Dismiss; Order to Show Cause by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Defendant De Sylva's motion to dismiss plaintiffs third claim for violation of the Bane Act 8 is DENIED. Plaintiff and De Sylva are ordered to show cause as to why plaintiffs§ 1983 claim should not be dismissed and the action remanded to state court. The parties are directed to submit responses to this Order on or before 12/22/2017. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
