United States of America v. Jean Louis Rubin

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District United States of America v. Jean Louis Rubin

United States of America v. Jean Louis Rubin

Petitioner:	United States of America
Respondent:	Jean Louis Rubin
Case Number:	2:2017cv08729
Filed:	December 4, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Karen L. Stevenson
Nature of Suit:	Other

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 19, 2019	Filing 47 JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: As s of December 9, 2015, defendant Jean-Louis Rubin is personally indebted to the United States of America for unpaid Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) penalty assessments for the 2006, 2007, and 2008 calendar years in the amount of $335,645.00, as well as penalties for late payment under 31 U.S.C. 3717(e)(2) and interest from the date of assessment to the date of full payment. Accordingly, Petitioners Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as Moot 33 .Related to: Stipulation 46 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)
July 9, 2019	Filing 35 ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION, REPLY, AND TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANTS 33 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II : the hearing on Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment is continued to Monday, August 19, 2019, at 1:30 p.m.; (2) the Defendants Opposition to the Motion is due on July 22, 2019; and (3) Plaintiffs Reply to Defendants Opposition is due August 5, 2019. (lc). Modified on 7/9/2019 (lc).

Date Filed

Document Text

November 19, 2019

Filing 47 JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: As s of December 9, 2015, defendant Jean-Louis Rubin is personally indebted to the United States of America for unpaid Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) penalty assessments for the 2006, 2007, and 2008 calendar years in the amount of $335,645.00, as well as penalties for late payment under 31 U.S.C. 3717(e)(2) and interest from the date of assessment to the date of full payment. Accordingly, Petitioners Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as Moot 33 .Related to: Stipulation 46 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)

July 9, 2019

Filing 35 ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION, REPLY, AND TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANTS 33 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II : the hearing on Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment is continued to Monday, August 19, 2019, at 1:30 p.m.; (2) the Defendants Opposition to the Motion is due on July 22, 2019; and (3) Plaintiffs Reply to Defendants Opposition is due August 5, 2019. (lc). Modified on 7/9/2019 (lc).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Jean Louis Rubin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Jean Louis Rubin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: United States of America
Represented By:	Najah J Shariff
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?