Healthcare Ally Management of California, LLC v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., et al
Healthcare Ally Management of California, LLC |
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. and Does |
2:2018cv01658 |
February 28, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Paul L. Abrams |
Dolly M. Gee |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT IMPOSE SANCTIONS ON THE PARTIES' COUNSEL by Judge Dolly M. Gee: On 5/17/2018, the Court ordered the parties to complete early mediation by 10/19/2018, and to submit a joint st atus report regarding the results of early mediation by 10/26/2018 12 , 13 . To date, the parties have not filed their joint status report re early mediation, and there is no indication that the parties have participated in early mediation. Counsel for both parties are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Court should not sanction them for failure to comply with a Court order. The attorneys shall file a joint response to this Order by 3/8/2019. The joint response shall not exceed ten pages in length. As an alternative to the attorneys' written responses, the Court will accept a joint status report regarding the results of their early mediation (if any). Any such joint status report must be filed no later than 3/8/2019. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.