Brighton Collectibles, LLC v. www.fidgetnecklaceuk.com
Brighton Collectibles, LLC |
Does and www.fidgetnecklaceuk.com |
2:2018cv02017 |
March 12, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Patrick J. Walsh |
Otis D. Wright |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION as to the persons operating the Websites, as well as their officers, agents, etc (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFICS); the certified check in the amount of $10,000 that Brighton previously posted as security see ECF No. 20 is deemed adequate for payment of such damages as any person may be entitled to recover as a result of a wrongful seizure or restraint hereunder by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc) |
Filing 24 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS EX PARTE APPLICATION 23 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: 1. The Courts March 12, 2018 Order Granting in Part Plaintiffs Ex Parte Application for (1) Temporary Restraining Order and (2) Order to Show Cause Re Preliminary Injunction Doc. No. 16 is modified to include www.fidgetnecklacesaleuk.com within the definition of the Website being enjoined.2. The Court DENIES Brightons request for an order compelling GoDaddy and EGI Hosting to comply with the subpoenas without prejudice. The proper vehicle for such relief is a Motion to Compel pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of this District. (lc). Modified on 4/4/2018 .(lc). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.