John Ray Gholar v. Michael Martel

Petitioner: John Ray Gholar
Respondent: Michael Martel
Case Number: 2:2018cv02033
Filed: March 12, 2018
Court: California Central District Court
Referring Judge: Charles F. Eick
Presiding Judge: Otis D. Wright
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 5, 2018 8 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Pursuant to the "Order of Dismissal," It is Adjudged that the Petition is denied and dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sp)
March 12, 2018 4 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER TRANSFERRING Case to the United States District Court for the Central District of California, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 3/10/2018. (Hellings, J) [Transferred from California Eastern on 3/12/2018.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: John Ray Gholar v. Michael Martel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: John Ray Gholar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Michael Martel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?