Daneil Lopez v. Liquor 1940, Inc et al
| Daniel Lopez |
| Does and Liquor 1940, Inc |
| 2:2018cv02577 |
| March 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| R. Gary Klausner |
| Frederick F. Mumm |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge R. Gary Klausner. On June 8, 2018, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution ("OSC") 11 . On June 12, 2018, plaintiff filed a Notice of Settlemen t and Request to Vacate all Currently Set Dates 12 . The Court denied the Request on June 13, 2018, informing the parties that they were not relieved of any deadlines or court appearances until a dismissal of the action was filed 13 . On June 13, 2018 plaintiff filed a response to the OSC, requesting that defendant's deadline to respond to the complaint be extended by 60 days 14 . On June 14, 2018, the request to extend the responsive deadline was denied by the Court and the parties were again informed that they were not relieved of any deadlines or court appearances until a dismissal of the action was filed 15 . As of today's date, defendant has not filed a responsive document and plaintiff has not requested default by the Clerk, therefore, the matter is hereby dismissed without prejudice, for lack of prosecution. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (pso)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
