John Einbund v. Ford Motor Company et al
| John Einbund |
| Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2018cv02724 |
| April 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 REFUND OF Re: APPLICATION for Refund of Fees Paid Re: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 #11 . (rdj) |
| Filing 11 APPLICATION for Refund of Fees Paid Re: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Dye, Stephen) |
| Filing 10 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles Superior Court No. BC696082. (lc) |
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Percy Anderson:Before the Court is a Notice of Removal filed by defendant Ford Motor Company on April 3, 2018. Defendant asserts that this Court has jurisdiction over the action brought against it byplaintiff John Einbund ( based on the Courts diversity jurisdiction. Defendant has failed to satisfy its burden of showing that diversity jurisdiction exists over this action. Accordingly, this action is hereby remanded to Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. BC69608, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. 1447(c). Defendants Ex Parte Application to Stay (Docket No. 7) is denied as moot.(Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number BC696082 with filing fee previously paid ($400 paid on 04/03/2018, receipt number 0973-21522891), filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Declaration)(Harlow, Charles) |
| Filing 7 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Stay Case pending Determination of Inclusion in Multidistrict Litigation Pending in this District filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Harlow, Charles) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Ford Motor Company. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff John Einbund. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 2/26/2017 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. Related Case(s): MDL No. 2814 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)(Harlow, Charles) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company identifying State Street Corporation as Corporate Parent. (Harlow, Charles) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Harlow, Charles) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number BC696082 Receipt No: 0973-21522891 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Declaration) (Attorney Charles Frederick Harlow added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Harlow, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
