Salvador Flores v. City of Pasadena et al
||City of Pasadena, DOES, Steven Marmell, Pasadena Police Department and Phillip A. Sanchez
||May 7, 2018
||US District Court for the Central District of California
||Dean D. Pregerson
|Nature of Suit:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 2, 2020
ORDER OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Before the Court is a Stipulation of Dismissal, 138 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Having read and considered t he stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS ORDERED as follows: All claims as against all parties in this action shall be and hereby are dismissed, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own fees and costs. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb)
|October 10, 2019
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, 56 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: The court grants in part and denies in part Defendants motion for summary judgment. The court grants summary judgment on Plaintiffs m alicious prosecution and battery claims and denies summary judgment on Plaintiffs remaining claims. The court further dismisses defendants City Manager Steven Mermell, Pasadena Police Department, Chief of Police Phillip A. Sanchez, Officer Dean Bisterfeldt, and Officer Matthew Griffen without prejudice. See order for details. (shb)
|May 8, 2019
ORDER RE: STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian: re Stipulation for Protective Order, 46 . (sbou)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?