Miguel Angel Ruiz v. Caraustar Custom Packaging Group, Inc. et al
Miguel Angel Ruiz |
Caraustar Industrial and Consumer Products, Caraustar Corp., Caraustar Custom Packaging Group, Inc., Caraustar Industrial and Consumer Products Group, Inc., Caraustar Industries, Inc., Crockett Graphics, Inc., Does, Laberk Harper, Los Angeles Paper Box and Carlos Medina |
2:2018cv05534 |
June 21, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alka Sagar |
George H. Wu |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 MINUTES OF PLAINTIFF MIGUEL ANGEL RUIZ'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER TO REMAND TO STATE COURT; REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENSE COUNSEL IN AMOUNT OF $2,100.00 23 ; DEFENDANTS CARAUSTAR CUSTOM PACKAGING GROUP, INC.; CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIAL AND C ONSUMER PRODUCTS; LOS ANGELES PAPER BOX; CARAUSTER INDUSTRIES, INC.; CARAUSTER CORP.; CARLOS MEDINA; AND CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIAL AND CONSUMER PRODUCTS GROUP, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND/OR PROVIDE A MORE DEFINITE STATEME NT 17 Hearing held before Judge George H. Wu. The Tentative circulated and attached hereto, is adopted as the Court's Final Ruling. The Court would GRANT the Motion to Remand and REMAND the case to state court. The Court would DECLINE TO CONSIDER the Motion to Dismiss because it lacks jurisdiction to do so. Request for sanctions is DENIED. Case Remanded to Los Angeles Superior Court, BC705228. MD JS-6. Case Terminated. Court Reporter: Katie Thibodeaux. (mrgo) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.