DeAndre Deshawn George v. Martin Biter
| DeAndre Deshawn George |
| Martin Biter |
| 2:2018cv05634 |
| June 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andrew J Guilford |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
Order by Judge Andrew J. Guilford denying Certificate of Appealability. (mat)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER DISMISSING SUCCESSIVE HABEAS ACTION by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. Because the Court does not have jurisdiction to consider Petitioner's claim, the action is DISMISSED without prejudice as successive. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See Order for further details) Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (vm)
|
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Respondent Martin Biter, re Notice of Appearance #5 served on July 13, 2018. (Karlin, Louis) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Louis W Karlin on behalf of Respondent Martin Biter (Attorney Louis W Karlin added to party Martin Biter(pty:res))(Karlin, Louis) |
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM filed by DeAndre D. George, petitioner. (vm) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER RE: REVIEW OF HABEAS PETITION by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. It is ORDERED that Petitioner will file a memorandum by or before July 27, 2018, not to exceed 5 pages showing good cause why the case should not be dismissed. (See Minute Order for further details) Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition) (vm)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Andrew J. Guilford and referred to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV-111) (lh) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge Andrew J. Guilford and referred to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (Filing Fee $5 Due), filed by Petitioner DeAndre Deshawn George. (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: DeAndre Deshawn George v. Martin Biter | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: DeAndre Deshawn George | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Martin Biter | |
| Represented By: | Louis W Karlin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
