Vidillion, Inc. v. Pixalate, Inc. et al
| Vidillion, Inc. |
| Does 1 through10, inclusive, Pixalate, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2018cv07270 |
| August 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Alka Sagar |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer: Granting #17 Non-Resident Attorney Troy K. Lieberman APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant, Pixalate, Inc, designating Erin J. Holyoke as local counsel. (shb)
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer: Granting #16 Non-Resident Attorney Jason C. Kravitz APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant, Pixalate, Inc, designating Erin J. Holyoke as local counsel. (shb)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 1/28/2019 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (kd)
|
| Filing 17 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Troy K. Lieberman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Pixalate, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-22517944) filed by Defendant Pixalate, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order proposed order) (Holyoke, Erin) |
| Filing 16 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jason C. Kravitz to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Pixalate, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-22517689) filed by Defendant Pixalate, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order proposed order) (Holyoke, Erin) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Pixalate, Inc., (Holyoke, Erin) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND and Affirmative Defenses, COUNTERCLAIM against Vidillion, Inc. filed by Defendant Pixalate, Inc..(Holyoke, Erin) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DUE DATE FOR DEFENDANT PIXALATE, INC.S RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT TO OCTOBER 2, 2018by Judge Dale S. Fischer. the Court hereby GRANTS the Joint Stipulation and ORDERS that the last day to file aresponse to Plaintiffs Complaint is continued from September 18, 2018 to October 2, 2018. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl)
|
| Filing 12 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Vidillion, Inc., upon Defendant Pixalate, Inc. served on 8/28/2018, answer due 10/2/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Pfirrman, Christina) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Pixalate, Inc. answer now due 10/2/2018, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Pixalate, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Erin J. Holyoke In Support of Stipulation, #2 Proposed Order)(Attorney Erin Jean Holyoke added to party Pixalate, Inc.(pty:dft))(Holyoke, Erin) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Pixalate, Inc.. (bp) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (dp)
|
| Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Vidillion, Inc.. (Drummond, Donald) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #3 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The date and signature line must be left blank. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Vidillion, Inc., (Drummond, Donald) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plaintiff Vidillion, Inc.. (Drummond, Donald) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Vidillion, Inc.. (Drummond, Donald) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22277228 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Vidillion, Inc.. (Attorney Donald F Drummond added to party Vidillion, Inc.(pty:pla))(Drummond, Donald) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
