Leslie James Gaines Jr. v. C. Pfeiffer
| Leslie James Gaines, Jr |
| C. Pfeiffer |
| 2:2018cv07681 |
| September 4, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| James V Selna |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: DISMISSAL by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Plaintiff request to voluntary dismiss this case. (Docket # 5.) This action is dismissed. re: Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support #5 . (vm)
|
| Filing 6 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by petitioner Leslie James Gaines, Jr. (vm) |
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM and voluntary dismissal of application to acquire Ninth Circuit leave to file a successive action filed by plaintiff Leslie James Gaines, Jr. (vm) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of California Attorney General Office Kenneth C. Byrne on behalf of Respondent C. Pfeiffer. (Attorney Kenneth C Byrne added to party C. Pfeiffer (pty:res))(Byrne, Kenneth) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER RE: REVIEW OF HABEAS PETITION by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. It is ORDERED that Petitioner will file a memorandum by or before October 5,2018, not to exceed 5 pages showing good cause why the case should not be dismissed. (See Minute Order for further details) Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition) (vm)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge James V. Selna and referred to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV111 Notice of Discrepancies for filing of Habeas Corpus Petition) (et) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge James V. Selna and referred to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (Filing fee $ 5 FEE DUE.), filed by Petitioner Leslie James Gaines, Jr. (et) (Main Document 1 replaced on 9/7/2018) (rsm). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Leslie James Gaines Jr. v. C. Pfeiffer | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Leslie James Gaines, Jr | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: C. Pfeiffer | |
| Represented By: | Kenneth C Byrne |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
