Lorenzo Mendoza v. Costco Wholesale Corporation, et al
| Lorenzo Mendoza |
| Does 1 to 50 and Costco Wholesale Corporation |
| 2:2018cv08013 |
| September 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Dolly M Gee |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee. The Scheduling Conference, currently scheduled for hearing on November 2, 2018, is hereby VACATED and no appearances are necessary. The Court will issue a Scheduling and Case Management Order based upon a review of the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Business or Contact Information: for attorney Jessica Farley counsel for Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation. Changing firm name to Snyder Burnett Egerer, LLP. Filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Farley, Jessica) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Business or Contact Information: for attorney Sean R Burnett counsel for Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation. Changing firm name to Snyder Burnett Egerer, LLP. Filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Burnett, Sean) |
| Filing 9 Joint Report Regarding Parties' Rule 26(f) Conference filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proof of Service)(Burnett, Sean) |
| Filing 8 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 26(f)] by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/19/2018. Scheduling Conference set for 11/2/2018 at 9:30 a.m. (See order for details.) (kti) |
|
Filing 7
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation, identifying Lorenzo Mendez; Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Burnett, Sean) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Burnett, Sean) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Burnett, Sean) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Santa Barbara Superior Court, case number 18CV03479 Receipt No: 0973-22424693 - Fee: $400, filed by defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Notice and Acknowledgment of Receipt, #3 Exhibit Statement of Damages, #4 Exhibit Demand for Settlement, #5 Proof of Service) (Attorney Sean R Burnett added to party Target Corporation(pty:bkmov))(Burnett, Sean) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Costco Wholesale Corporation, Does 1 to 50, filed by plaintiff Lorenzo Mendoza. (Filed in state court 7/2/18, submitted as document 1, attachment 1) (esa) |
| COPY OF NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Lorenzo Mendoza, upon Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 8/6/2018. Acknowledgment of Service signed by Sean Burnett, Counsel. (non-conformed submitted as document 1, attachment 2)(esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
