Cash Case v. Individual Commanders of U.S. Army
| Cash Case |
| Individual Commanders of the U.S. Army and Individual Commanders of U.S. Army |
| 2:2018cv08054 |
| September 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Patrick J Walsh |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Rules 8, 12(b)(1) and (b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures filed by Defendant Individual Commanders of U.S. Army. Motion set for hearing on 12/10/2018 at 10:00 AM before Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Declaration Crystal Baltimore, #3 Declaration Grace Park, #4 Declaration Kenneth Clayton, #5 Declaration Vivian Pritchett, #6 Proof of Service) (Park, Grace) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE Pendency of Other Actions or Proceedings filed by defendant Individual Commanders of U.S. Army. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Park, Grace) |
Filing 7
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT #6 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald: Plaintiff Cash Case may file a First Amended Complaint no later than October 8, 2018. (iv)
|
| Filing 6 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for Extending Time to Respond to Complaint ; Declaration of Grace Y. Park filed by defendant Individual Commanders of U.S. Army. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proof of Service) (Park, Grace) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by defendant Individual Commanders of U.S. Army, of Notice to State Court and Adverse Parties of Removal of Civil Action to United States District Court served on 9/18/2018. (Park, Grace) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. (esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendant Individual Commanders of U.S. Army, filed by plaintiff Cash Case. (Filed in state court 7/5/18, submitted as document 1, attachment 1) (esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE executed by Plaintiff Cash Case, upon Defendant Individual Commanders of U.S. Army served on 9/5/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were NOT executed upon the United States Attorneys Office which was NOT served. The Attorney Generals Office of the United States was NOT served. The officer agency or corporation was NOT served. Service was executed in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Filed in state court 9/7/18, submitted as document 1, attachment 3) (esa) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Individual Commanders of the U.S. Army. (Park, Grace) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, case number BC712702 Fee Exemption in accordance with statute, filed by defendant Individual Commanders of the U.S. Army. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Proof of Service) (Attorney Grace Y Park added to party Individual Commanders of the U.S. Army(pty:dft))(Park, Grace) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
