Neman Brothers and Assoc. Inc. v. Ross Stores et al
NEMAN BROTHERS & ASSOC., INC. and Neman Brothers and Assoc. Inc. |
ROSS STORES, INC., DOES 1-10, inclusive,, DOES 1-10, inclusive and Ross Stores, Inc. a Delaware Corporation doing business as DD'S Discounts |
2:2018cv08922 |
October 16, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Charles F Eick |
Dale S Fischer |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. § 101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 4/8/2019 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ross Stores, Inc., identifying Ross Stores, Inc. and Gogo Jeans, Inc.. (Burke, Amy) |
Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Ross Stores, Inc..(Burke, Amy) |
Filing 12 Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Ross Stores, Inc. answer now due 12/12/2018, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Ross Stores, Inc..(Burke, Amy) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Neman Brothers and Assoc. Inc., re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Summons Issued (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #8 served on 10/23/2018. (Jeong, Chan) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Ross Stores, Inc. answer now due 11/30/2018, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Ross Stores, Inc..(Attorney Amy E Burke added to party Ross Stores, Inc.(pty:dft))(Burke, Amy) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (jre) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Ross Stores, Inc. (jtil) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (jtil) |
Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by NEMAN BROTHERS & ASSOC., INC.. (Jeong, Chan) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff NEMAN BROTHERS & ASSOC., INC.. (Jeong, Chan) |
Filing 3 Certificate and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff NEMAN BROTHERS & ASSOC., INC., identifying Defendants. (Jeong, Chan) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff NEMAN BROTHERS & ASSOC., INC.. (Jeong, Chan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22585664 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff NEMAN BROTHERS & ASSOC., INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Attorney Chan Yong Jeong added to party NEMAN BROTHERS & ASSOC., INC.(pty:pla))(Jeong, Chan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.