Epic Produce Sales, LLC v. Abdullah Morceli
Epic Produce Sales, LLC |
Abdullah Morceli and Abdullah Morceli individually and doing business as Morceli Produce |
2:2018cv08978 |
October 17, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alicia G Rosenberg |
George H Wu |
Agriculture Acts |
07 U.S.C. ยง 499 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Standing Order Re Final Pre-Trial Conferences for Civil Jury Trials Before Judge George H. Wu by Judge George H. Wu. (See document for details) (mrgo) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Abdullah Morceli. (esa) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (esa) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Epic Produce Sales, LLC. (Botta, Bartholomew) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Epic Produce Sales, LLC, (Botta, Bartholomew) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Epic Produce Sales, LLC. (Botta, Bartholomew) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22597679 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Epic Produce Sales, LLC. (Attorney Bartholomew M Botta added to party Epic Produce Sales, LLC(pty:pla))(Botta, Bartholomew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.