Chris Bridges v. Northwest Administrators, Inc.
Chris Bridges |
TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION #495, NORTHWEST ADMINISTRATORS, INC., a California corporation, Northwest Administrators, Inc. and Teamsters Local Union No. 495 |
2:2018cv09141 |
October 24, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jean P Rosenbluth |
Otis D Wright |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE #12 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc) |
Filing 12 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to per Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by defendant Northwest Administrators, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Sackman, J) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Northwest Administrators, Inc., re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, #8 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #7 , Order #9 , Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #6 served on October 26, 2018. (Sackman, J) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Natalia N Bautista on behalf of Defendant Northwest Administrators, Inc. (Bautista, Natalia) |
Filing 9 SELF-REPRESENTATION ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc) |
Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC FILING REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION; PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. all proposed sealed documents must be submitted via e-mail to the Judges Chambers email address, EXCLUDING those submitted by pro se parties and IN CAMERA filings, which shall continue to comply with Local Rule 79-5.1. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE to Adverse Party of Notice of Removal filed by defendant Northwest Administrators, Inc.. (Sackman, J) |
Filing 4 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney J David Sackman counsel for Defendant NORTHWEST ADMINISTRATORS, INC., a California corporation. Adding J. David Sackman as counsel of record for Defendant Northwest Administrators, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by defendant Northwest Administrators, Inc.. (Attorney J David Sackman added to party NORTHWEST ADMINISTRATORS, INC., a California corporation(pty:dft))(Sackman, J) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties (Chandna, Neelam) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant NORTHWEST ADMINISTRATORS, INC., a California corporation. (Chandna, Neelam) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Orange, case number 30-2018-01020800-SC-SC-HNB Receipt No: 0973-22635560 - Fee: $400, filed by defendant NORTHWEST ADMINISTRATORS, INC., a California corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Neelam Chandna added to party NORTHWEST ADMINISTRATORS, INC., a California corporation(pty:dft))(Chandna, Neelam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.