Mitchell Oifoh v. Michael Kors USA, Inc. et al
Mitchell Oifoh |
DOES 1 through 50, inclusive., Michael Kors (USA), Inc., Michael Kors USA, Inc. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
2:2018cv09706 |
November 16, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Andre Birotte |
Alka Sagar |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Scheduling Conference set for 3/8/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb) |
Filing 13 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. On December 20, 2018, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why it should not dismiss this action for lack of prosecution. Plaintiff has filed a response to the Order to Show Cause re Lack of Prosecution on December 20, 2018. The Court deems that response satisfactory, and orders the Order to Show Cause discharged. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cb) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 12 DECLARATION of Daniel A. Reisman re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set/Reset Deadlines,, #10 filed by Plaintiff Mitchell Oifoh. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Conformed copy of answer)(Reisman, Daniel) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Previously Filed Answer filed by Defendant Michael Kors USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Michael Kors (USA), Inc.'s Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint)(Levy, Elizabeth) |
Filing 10 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order To Show Cause Regarding Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before 1/4/2019, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. Defendant(s) Michael Kors USA, Inc. did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff(s) have failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (car) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Michael Kors USA, Inc..(Filing fee $ 400) Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Mitchell Oifoh. Filed in State Court on 10/17/18 Submitted with attachment 1 to notice of removal #1 (car) |
Filing 6 DECLARATION of Jennifer Gurenlian re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Michael Kors (USA), Inc.. (Levy, Elizabeth) |
Filing 5 DECLARATION of Elizabeth M. Levy re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Michael Kors (USA), Inc.. (Levy, Elizabeth) |
Filing 4 STATEMENT of Disclosure filed by Defendant Michael Kors (USA), Inc. (Levy, Elizabeth) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Michael Kors (USA), Inc., identifying Michael Kors (USA), Inc.,Michael Kors Holdings, Inc., Mitchell Oifoh. (Levy, Elizabeth) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Michael Kors (USA), Inc.. (Levy, Elizabeth) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 18STCV01184 Receipt No: 0973-22759822 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Michael Kors (USA), Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (Attorney Elizabeth Mary Levy added to party Michael Kors (USA), Inc.(pty:dft))(Levy, Elizabeth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.