Zarian v. Bluee LLC et al
Samuel Zarian |
Does 1-10, Pacific Kosher at Woodland Hills, Inc. and Bluee LLC |
2:2018cv09752 |
November 19, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dale S Fischer |
Steve Kim |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 Stipulation to extend time filed by Defendants Bluee LLC, Does 1-10, Pacific Kosher at Woodland Hills, Inc. (Kast, Gary) |
Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Samuel Zarian, upon Defendant Bluee LLC served on 12/14/2018, answer due 1/4/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for service: Registered Agents Inc/ Melisa Welch- Registered Agent in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Carson, Chris) |
Filing 13 First STIPULATION to Continue TIme to Respond from January 7, 2019 to January 25, 2019 filed by defendant Pacific Kosher at Woodland Hills, Inc..(Kast, Gary) |
Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Samuel Zarian, re Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only,, #9 served on 12/17/2018. (Carson, Chris) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Samuel Zarian, upon Defendant Pacific Kosher at Woodland Hills, Inc. served on 12/15/2018, answer due 1/7/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Ruben Galberman- The Manager in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Carson, Chris) |
Filing 10 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (rfi) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi) |
Filing 8 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 16-05. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Dean D. Pregerson to Judge Dale S. Fischer for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:18-cv-9752 DSF (SKx). (esa) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Bluee LLC, and Pacific Kosher at Woodland Hills, Inc. (jtil) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (jtil) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Samuel Zarian. (Carson, Chris) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Samuel Zarian, (Carson, Chris) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Samuel Zarian. (Carson, Chris) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22769258 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Samuel Zarian. (Attorney Chris Carson added to party Samuel Zarian(pty:pla))(Carson, Chris) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.