Mario Arguijo v. United States of America, et al
Mario Arguijo |
floyd edward travis, Jr, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,, united states postal service and United States of America |
2:2018cv10498 |
December 19, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Andre Birotte |
Jacqueline Chooljian |
Federal Employer's Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Nicole E Hoikka counsel for Plaintiff Mario Arguijo. Nicole E. Hoikka is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by plaintiff Mario Arguijo. (Attorney Nicole E Hoikka added to party Mario Arguijo(pty:pla))(Hoikka, Nicole) |
Filing 19 60-Day Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant Floyd Edward Travis, Jr. (gk) |
Filing 18 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to defendant United States of America. (twdb) |
Filing 17 60-Day Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant United States Postal Service. (gk) |
Filing 16 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Mario Arguijo. (Glickman, Steven) |
Filing 15 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Mario Arguijo. (Glickman, Steven) |
Filing 14 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Mario Arguijo. (Glickman, Steven) |
Filing 13 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Mario Arguijo. correcting Summons Request #11 United States Postal Service (Glickman, Steven) |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Mario Arguijo. correcting Summons Request #10 as to United States of America (Glickman, Steven) |
Filing 11 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Mario Arguijo. (Glickman, Steven) |
Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Mario Arguijo. (Glickman, Steven) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (jre) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons. The following error(s) was found: Summons is not directed to the defendant(s). The defendants name must appear in the To:section of the summons. The name and address of the attorney for plaintiff(s)must be entered in the appropriate field. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (esa) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (esa) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing Complaint filed by plaintiff Mario Arguijo. (Glickman, Steven) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Mario Arguijo. (Glickman, Steven) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Mario Arguijo, identifying Gallagher Bassett. (Glickman, Steven) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Mario Arguijo. (Glickman, Steven) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22919680 - Fee: $400, filed by plainitff Mario Arguijo. (Attorney Steven C Glickman added to party Mario Arguijo(pty:pla))(Glickman, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.