In the Matter of the Application of George W. Gouda
Petitioner: George W Gouda
Respondent: Scott Frauenheim
Undetermined: Attorney General of California
In Re: In the Matter of the Application of George W. Gouda
Case Number: 2:2019cv00192
Filed: January 9, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Ronald SW Lew
Referring Judge: Alicia G Rosenberg
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 26, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney E Carlos Dominguez on behalf of Respondent Scott Frauenheim (Attorney E Carlos Dominguez added to party Scott Frauenheim(pty:res))(Dominguez, E)
February 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REQUIRING A RESPONSE/ANSWER TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (28 U.S.C. 2254) by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. Within 14 days of the date of this Order, Respondent shall serve and file a Notice of Appearance notifying the court of the name of the attorney who will have principal charge of the case, together with the address where the attorney may be served, and the attorneys telephone and fax number. Respondent Attorney General of California file Answer to the Petition not later than 5/1/2019; Scott Frauenheim file Answer to the Petition not later than 5/1/2019. Motions to Dismiss shall be filed by 4/16/2019. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (See Order for Further Details) (Attachments: #1 Petition) (kl)
February 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: OPERATIVE PETITION by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. On January 9, 2019, Petitioner electronically filed a memorandum entitled "Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus" and attached two exhibits. (Dkt. No. #1 .) On January 31, 2019, this court issued an order instructing Petitioner to file a completed CV-69 Form or a document proscribed by a local district court rules and also instructed Petitioner to file mandatory chambers copies of each document. (Dkt. No. #3 .) On February 11, 2019, Petitioner filed a duplicate version of the initial habeas petition, but did not reattach the two exhibits contained in the first petition. (Dkt. No. #4 .) Because Dkt. No. #4 appears incomplete, this court will deem Dkt. No. #1 as the operative petition. (kl)
February 11, 2019 Filing 4 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (28 USC 2254), Fee Exempt pursuant to statue, filed by Petitioner George W Gouda.(Austin, Gary)
January 31, 2019 Filing 3 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS): OPPORTUNITY TO FILE COMPLETE PETITION by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. Petitioner is hereby ORDERED to file either (1) a completed CV-69 Form, or (2) a Petition that substantially follows the CV-69 Form or a document prescribed by a local district court rule on or before February 8, 2019. Petitioner is further ORDERED to submit mandatory chambers copies of all documents filed in compliance with local district court rules. (see document for further details) (hr)
January 10, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Ronald S.W. Lew and referred to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (jtil)
January 9, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (28 USC 2254), Fee Exempt pursuant to statue, filed by Petitioner George W Gouda. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit) (Attorney Gary S Austin added to party George W Gouda(pty:pet))(Austin, Gary)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In the Matter of the Application of George W. Gouda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: George W Gouda
Represented By: Gary S Austin
Represented By: Winston Kevin McKesson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Undetermined: Attorney General of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Scott Frauenheim
Represented By: E Carlos Dominguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
In re: In the Matter of the Application of George W. Gouda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?