ACLU of Southern California v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
Plaintiff: ACLU of Southern California
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security and United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Case Number: 2:2019cv00983
Filed: February 8, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Philip S Gutierrez
Referring Judge: Michael R Wilner
Nature of Suit: Freedom of Information Act
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 18, 2019 Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff ACLU of Southern California, upon Defendant United States Department of Homeland Security served on 2/27/2019, answer due 4/29/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were NOT executed upon the United States Attorneys Office which was NOT served. The Attorney Generals Office of the United States was NOT served. The officer agency or corporation was NOT served. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons returned. (Gauger, Neal)
March 15, 2019 Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff ACLU of Southern California, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were NOT executed upon the United States Attorneys Office which was NOT served. The Attorney Generals Office of the United States was NOT served. The officer agency or corporation was NOT served. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons returned. (Gauger, Neal)
March 15, 2019 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff ACLU of Southern California, upon Defendant United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement served on 2/27/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were NOT executed upon the United States Attorneys Office which was NOT served. The Attorney Generals Office of the United States was NOT served. The officer agency or corporation was NOT served. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons returned. (Gauger, Neal)
February 26, 2019 Filing 11 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff ACLU of Southern California. correcting Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 (Gauger, Neal)
February 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
February 11, 2019 Filing 9 30 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (ghap)
February 11, 2019 Filing 8 30 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant United States Department of Homeland Security. (ghap)
February 11, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
February 11, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (ghap)
February 8, 2019 Filing 5 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Jason P Gonzalez counsel for Plaintiff ACLU of Southern California. Adding Jason P. Gonzalez as counsel of record for ACLU of Southern California for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff ACLU of Southern California. (Attorney Jason P Gonzalez added to party ACLU of Southern California(pty:pla))(Gonzalez, Jason)
February 8, 2019 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff ACLU of Southern California. (Gauger, Neal)
February 8, 2019 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff ACLU of Southern California. (Gauger, Neal)
February 8, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff ACLU of Southern California. (Gauger, Neal)
February 8, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23185251 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff ACLU of Southern California. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Complaint, #2 Exhibit B to Complaint, #3 Exhibit C to Complaint) (Attorney Neal James Gauger added to party ACLU of Southern California(pty:pla))(Gauger, Neal)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ACLU of Southern California v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ACLU of Southern California
Represented By: Neal James Gauger
Represented By: Jason P Gonzalez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?