Elia Haggar et al v. Kimpton Group Holding LLC et al
| Kyo Hak Chu, Valerie Brooks and Elia Haggar |
| KIMPTON GROUP HOLDING, LLC, Kimpton Group Holding LLC, Kimpton Hotel and Restaurant Group LLC and Does 1 to 10, inclusive |
| 2:2019cv01095 |
| February 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John E McDermott |
| George H Wu |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Kimpton Group Holding LLC amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , filed by Plaintiffs Elia Haggar, Valerie Brooks, Kyo Hak Chu(Coelho, Thiago) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Authority to Amend Complaint as a Matter of Course filed by Plaintiffs Valerie Brooks, Kyo Hak Chu, Elia Haggar. (Coelho, Thiago) |
| Filing 11 STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE JUDGE GEORGE H WU. You are instructed to read and to follow (unless otherwise superseded herein) the Central District of California Local Rules (henceforth Local Rules) 16-1 through 16-15 regarding pre-trial requirements. See order for further details. (shb) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Elia Haggar, Valerie Brooks, Kyo Hak Chu, upon Defendant Kimpton Group Holding LLC served on 2/15/2019, answer due 3/8/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Becky DeGeorge, registered Agent authorized for service of process to accept service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Coelho, Thiago) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to defendant Kimpton Group Holding LLC. (mrgo) |
| Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Valerie Brooks, Kyo Hak Chu, Elia Haggar. (Coelho, Thiago) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #4 . The following error(s) was found: Summons is not directed to the defendant(s). The defendants name must appear in the To:section of the summons. The name and address of the attorney for plaintiff(s)must be entered in the appropriate field. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (car) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Valerie Brooks, Kyo Hak Chu, Elia Haggar. (Coelho, Thiago) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Valerie Brooks, Kyo Hak Chu, Elia Haggar. (Coelho, Thiago) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Valerie Brooks, Kyo Hak Chu, Elia Haggar, (Coelho, Thiago) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23207649 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs Elia Haggar, Valerie Brooks, Kyo Hak Chu. (Attorney Thiago Merlini Coelho added to party Valerie Brooks(pty:pla), Attorney Thiago Merlini Coelho added to party Kyo Hak Chu(pty:pla), Attorney Thiago Merlini Coelho added to party Elia Haggar(pty:pla))(Coelho, Thiago) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
