David Nunes-Childs v. Nancy A. Berryhill
| David Nunes-Childs |
| Nancy A. Berryhill |
| 2:2019cv01121 |
| February 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| James V Selna |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by plaintiff David Nunes-Childs. (Drake, Erika) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff David Nunes-Childs, upon Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill served on 4/3/2019, answer due 6/3/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by unspecified means. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by unspecified means. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certified Mail Proof)(Drake, Erika) |
Filing 9
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (Attachments: #1 Consent CV-11) (clee)
|
| Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (clee) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS #5 by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (clee)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (et) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff David Nunes-Childs. (Drake, Erika) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff David Nunes-Childs, (Drake, Erika) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff David Nunes-Childs. (Drake, Erika) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff David Nunes-Childs. (Drake, Erika) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by plaintiff David Nunes-Childs. (Attorney Erika Bailey Drake added to party David Nunes-Childs(pty:pla))(Drake, Erika) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: David Nunes-Childs v. Nancy A. Berryhill | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill | |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-CV |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: David Nunes-Childs | |
| Represented By: | Erika Bailey Drake |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
