Paul Hammond v. Westlake Services, LLC et al
| Paul Hammond |
| Westlake Services, LLC, Does 1 through 10, inclusive, and each of them and Westlake Services, LLC doing business as Westlake Financial Services |
| 2:2019cv01234 |
| February 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| John E McDermott |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0227 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Westlake Services, LLC. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Paul Hammond. (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Paul Hammond, (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Paul Hammond. (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Paul Hammond. (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23236726 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Paul Hammond. (Attorney Todd M Friedman added to party Paul Hammond(pty:pla))(Friedman, Todd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
