Gary Scherer v. M and O Properties, LTD. et al
| Gary Scherer |
| Does 1-10, M & O Properties, LTD. and M and O Properties, LTD. |
| 2:2019cv01284 |
| February 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Ronald SW Lew |
| Frederick F Mumm |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation Early Mediation Program. (jre) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant M and O Properties, LTD. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Gary Scherer. (Carson, Chris) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Gary Scherer, (Carson, Chris) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Gary Scherer. (Carson, Chris) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23247581 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Gary Scherer. (Attorney Chris Carson added to party Gary Scherer(pty:pla))(Carson, Chris) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
