Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. Certified Crane Services, Inc.
| Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Defined Contribution Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund, Trustees of the National Electrical Benefit Fund and Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union |
| Certified Crane Services, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv02793 |
| April 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1145 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Percy Anderson. Default by clerk was entered on June 17, 2019. Plaintiff is hereby directed to file a motion for default judgment or, other appropriate dispositive motion on or before July 17, 2019. (mrgo)
|
| Filing 12 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Certified Crane Services, Inc. a California corporation. (mrgo) |
| Filing 11 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Certified Crane Services, Inc. filed by Plaintiffs Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the National Electrical Benefit Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Defined Contribution Trust Fund, Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Susan Graham Lovelace) (Lovelace, Susan) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal For Lack Of Prosecution by Judge Percy Anderson. Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States). Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1). In the present case, it appears that this time period has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before June 17, 2019 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (lom)
|
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the National Electrical Benefit Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Defined Contribution Trust Fund, Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union, upon Defendant Certified Crane Services, Inc. served on 5/10/2019, answer due 5/31/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Heather Wopershall - Administrator in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Lovelace, Susan) |
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (mrgo)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Certified Crane Services, Inc. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union, Trustees of the National Electrical Benefit Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Defined Contribution Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, (Lovelace, Susan) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),,, #1 filed by Plaintiffs Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union, Trustees of the National Electrical Benefit Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Defined Contribution Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan. (Lovelace, Susan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union, Trustees of the National Electrical Benefit Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Defined Contribution Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan. (Lovelace, Susan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23535510 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the National Electrical Benefit Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Defined Contribution Trust Fund, Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union. (Attorney Susan Graham Lovelace added to party Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union(pty:pla), Attorney Susan Graham Lovelace added to party Trustees of the National Electrical Benefit Fund(pty:pla), Attorney Susan Graham Lovelace added to party Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Defined Contribution Trust Fund(pty:pla), Attorney Susan Graham Lovelace added to party Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund(pty:pla), Attorney Susan Graham Lovelace added to party Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan(pty:pla))(Lovelace, Susan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
