John D. Tracy v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC et al
| John D. Tracy |
| Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC and Does 1 through 100, inclusive |
| 2:2019cv02884 |
| April 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Steve Kim |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER AND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES by Judge Dolly M. Gee: In light of Plaintiff's notice of settlement, indicating that the case has settled in its entirety #11 , this action is placed in inactive status. By 8/5/2019, the parties shall file either (1) a stipulation and proposed order for dismissal of the action or judgment, or (2) a motion to reopen if settlement has not been consummated. Upon the failure to timely comply with this Order, this action shall be deemed dismissed as of 8/6/2019. This Court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff John D. Tracy. (Starr, Robert) |
| Filing 10 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Lindsay G Carlson counsel for Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC. Lindsay G. Carlson is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC. (Carlson, Lindsay) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Upon Stipulation #8 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC to respond to the Complaint is continued to 6/21/2019. (gk)
|
| Filing 8 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to June 21, 2019 re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Reynolds, Bryan) |
| Filing 7 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC answer now due 5/22/2019, filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC.(Reynolds, Bryan) |
|
Filing 6
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 100, inclusive, Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC., filed by plaintiff John D. Tracy. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 3/11/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC. (Reynolds, Bryan) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC, (Reynolds, Bryan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 19STCV08184 Receipt No: 0973-23551509 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit Lease Agreement, #3 Exhibit Hakobyan Complaint, #4 Exhibit Hakobyan Order) (Attorney Bryan A Reynolds added to party Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC(pty:dft))(Reynolds, Bryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
