Brian Whitaker v. DavidsTea USA Inc. et al
| Brian Whitaker |
| Does 1-10, DavidsTea (USA) Inc. and DavidsTea USA Inc. |
| 2:2019cv02914 |
| April 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Manuel L Real |
| Gail J Standish |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant DavidsTea USA Inc., identifying DavidsTea, Inc. (Canada). (Moschella, Matthew) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant DavidsTea USA Inc..(Moschella, Matthew) |
Filing 13
ORDER by Judge Manuel L. Real Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Matthew C. Moschella to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant DavidsTea (USA) Inc., designating Yesenia M. Gallegos and Andrew W. Russell as local counsel #12 . (gk)
|
| Filing 12 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Matthew C. Moschella to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant DavidsTea USA Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23812582) filed by Defendant DavidsTea USA Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Yesenia M Gallegos added to party DavidsTea USA Inc.(pty:dft)) (Gallegos, Yesenia) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant DavidsTea USA Inc..(Attorney Andrew W Russell added to party DavidsTea USA Inc.(pty:dft))(Russell, Andrew) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, upon Defendant DavidsTea USA Inc. served on 4/24/2019, answer due 5/15/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY (Becky De George - Agent for service) in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 9 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (cch) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER RE: NOTICE TO COUNSEL upon filing of the complaint by Judge Manuel L. Real. READ CAREFULLY - FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY LEAD TO SANCTIONS. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (cch)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Consuelo B. Marshall to Judge Manuel L. Real for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-02914 R(GJSx). (rn)
|
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant DavidsTea USA Inc. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23555271 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Brian Whitaker(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
