Certain Underwriters at Lloyds Subscribing to Policy No. VE17XX3615D16 v. Hyundai Merchant Marine (America), Inc. et al
| Certain Underwriters at Lloyds Subscribing to Policy No. VE17XX3615D16 |
| Hyundai Merchant Marine (America), Inc., EZ Logistics LLC and Does one through ten |
| 2:2019cv04202 |
| May 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John E McDermott |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Contract: Marine |
| 49 U.S.C. ยง 81 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
IN CHAMBERS ORDER-TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: The Order to Show Cause #13 , issued on 06/19/2019, is DISCHARGED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to EZ Logistics LLC answer now due 7/18/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Certain Underwriters at Lloyds Subscribing to Policy No. VE17XX3615D16. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Kirsch, Joshua) |
|
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (Show Cause Response due by 7/3/2019.) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Certain Underwriters at Lloyds Subscribing to Policy No. VE17XX3615D16, upon Defendant EZ Logistics LLC served on 5/28/2019, answer due 6/18/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Rizhun Chen - Person Authorized to Accept Service of Process in compliance with statute not specified by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Kirsch, Joshua) |
|
Filing 11
NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant EZ Logistics LLC. (esa) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Hyundai Merchant Marine (America), Inc. (esa) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (esa) |
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Certain Underwriters at Lloyds Subscribing to Policy No. VE17XX3615D16 (Kirsch, Joshua) |
| Filing 5 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Certain Underwriters at Lloyds Subscribing to Policy No. VE17XX3615D16, identifying Best Food Services, LLC; TRN Transportation, Inc.; Express Shipping Logistics, Inc.. (Kirsch, Joshua) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Certain Underwriters at Lloyds Subscribing to Policy No. VE17XX3615D16. (Kirsch, Joshua) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Certain Underwriters at Lloyds Subscribing to Policy No. VE17XX3615D16. (Kirsch, Joshua) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Certain Underwriters at Lloyds Subscribing to Policy No. VE17XX3615D16. (Kirsch, Joshua) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23740860 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Certain Underwriters at Lloyds Subscribing to Policy No. VE17XX3615D16. (Attorney Joshua E Kirsch added to party Certain Underwriters at Lloyds Subscribing to Policy No. VE17XX3615D16(pty:pla))(Kirsch, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
