Salvatore Brancaccio v. Capital One Bank (USA) N.A
| Salvatore Brancaccio |
| Capital One Bank (USA) N.A |
| 2:2019cv04427 |
| May 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| Suzanne H Segal |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0227 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Scheduling Conference set for 3/30/2020 at 02:00 PM. (wm)
|
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.(Sasso, Marcos) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Capital One Bank (USA) N.A, identifying Capital One Financial Corporation. (Sasso, Marcos) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Capital One Bank (USA) N.A answer now due 7/16/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.(Attorney Marcos Daniel Sasso added to party Capital One Bank (USA) N.A(pty:dft))(Sasso, Marcos) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Salvatore Brancaccio, upon Defendant Capital One Bank (USA) N.A served on 6/11/2019, answer due 7/2/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Shannon Griffith, Employee in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Kent, Trinette) |
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Capital One Bank (USA) N.A. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. (esa) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Salvatore Brancaccio. (Kent, Trinette) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Salvatore Brancaccio, (Kent, Trinette) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Salvatore Brancaccio. (Kent, Trinette) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23783053 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Salvatore Brancaccio. (Attorney Trinette Gragirena Kent added to party Salvatore Brancaccio(pty:pla))(Kent, Trinette) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Salvatore Brancaccio v. Capital One Bank (USA) N.A | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Salvatore Brancaccio | |
| Represented By: | Trinette Gragirena Kent |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Capital One Bank (USA) N.A | |
| Represented By: | Marcos Daniel Sasso |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
