Nehemiah Kong v. Rosecrans Team, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Nehemiah Kong
Defendant: Michael Baradarian, Does 1-10, Ronald V. Lighty Jr and Rosecrans Team, LLC
Case Number: 2:2019cv04522
Filed: May 23, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Charles F Eick
Referring Judge: Manuel L Real
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 2, 2019 Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. During the docketing sequence, only Rosecrans Team, LLC, was selected as the filing party. This filing was made on behalf of Rosecrans Team, LLC, Michael Baradarian, and Ronald V. Lighty, Jr. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk)
June 28, 2019 Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by all Defendants Rosecrans Team, LLC.(Feldman, Stephen)
June 27, 2019 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nehemiah Kong, upon Defendant Ronald V. Lighty Jr served on 6/17/2019, answer due 7/8/2019. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell)
June 27, 2019 Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nehemiah Kong, upon Defendant Michael Baradarian served on 6/5/2019, answer due 6/26/2019. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell)
June 25, 2019 Filing 10 APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendants Rosecrans Team, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Stephen Mark Feldman added to party Rosecrans Team, LLC(pty:dft)) (Feldman, Stephen)
June 19, 2019 Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nehemiah Kong, upon Defendant Rosecrans Team, LLC served on 6/15/2019, answer due 7/8/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: MICHAEL BARADARIAN in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell)
May 28, 2019 Filing 8 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (cch)
May 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER RE: NOTICE TO COUNSEL upon filing of the complaint by Judge Manuel L. Real. READ CAREFULLY - FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY LEAD TO SANCTIONS. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (cch)
May 24, 2019 Filing 6 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendants Michael Baradarian, Ronald V. Lighty Jr, Rosecrans Team, LLC. (esa)
May 24, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Manuel L. Real and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (esa)
May 23, 2019 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Nehemiah Kong. (Handy, Russell)
May 23, 2019 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Nehemiah Kong, (Handy, Russell)
May 23, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Nehemiah Kong. (Handy, Russell)
May 23, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23798056 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Nehemiah Kong. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Nehemiah Kong(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nehemiah Kong v. Rosecrans Team, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nehemiah Kong
Represented By: Russell C Handy
Represented By: Dennis Jay Price, II
Represented By: Phyl Grace
Represented By: Raymond George Ballister, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Baradarian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ronald V. Lighty Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rosecrans Team, LLC
Represented By: Stephen Mark Feldman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?