Christopher Pina v. Subaru of America, Inc. et al
Christopher Pina |
Subaru of America, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
2:2019cv04956 |
June 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John A Kronstadt |
Karen L Stevenson |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 days, filed by Plaintiff Christopher Pina.. (Goldsmith, David) |
Filing 10 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Plaintiff Christopher Pina.. (Goldsmith, David) |
Filing 9 ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Hearing: Under Submission/No Hearing. Joint Report Due: August 2, 2019. This case has been assigned to Judge John A. Kronstadt. This Order applies to all parties in this action, whether or not they are represented by counsel. Counsel, as used in this Order, also refers to parties who are representing themselves. If plaintiff has not already served the complaint (or any amendment thereto) on each defendant, plaintiff shall promptly do so and file proofs of service within three (3) days thereafter. Defendant(s) also shall timely serve and file their responsive pleadings and file proofs of service within three (3) days thereafter. See order for details. (shb) |
Filing 8 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Courts Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. (shb) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (et) |
CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF ANSWER TO COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL filed by Defendant Subaru of America, Inc. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 6/5/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL AS ATTACHMENT NO. 2 #1 . (et) |
CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Subaru of America, Inc., Does 1 through 10, inclusive, filed by Plaintiff Christopher Pina. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 5/6/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 . (et) |
Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Subaru of America, Inc., re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Jury Demand #4 served on June 6, 2019. (Chinery, Jacqueline) |
Filing 4 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant Subaru of America, Inc... (Chinery, Jacqueline) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Subaru of America, Inc., identifying Subaru Corporation. (Chinery, Jacqueline) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Subaru of America, Inc.. (Chinery, Jacqueline) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 19GDCV00559 Receipt No: 0973-23878438 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Subaru of America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Attorney Jacqueline Bruce Chinery added to party Subaru of America, Inc.(pty:dft))(Chinery, Jacqueline) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.