Malik Lawrence v. Loews Hollywood Hotel, LLC

Plaintiff: MALIK LAWRENCE
Defendant: LOEWS HOLLYWOOD HOTEL, LLC
Case Number: 2:2019cv05171
Filed: June 13, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 13, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from LASC, case number 19STCV13281 Receipt No: 0973-23916445 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant LOEWS HOLLYWOOD HOTEL, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Notice of Interested Parties, #3 Declaration, #4 Declaration) (Attorney James H Demerjian added to party LOEWS HOLLYWOOD HOTEL, LLC(pty:dft))(Demerjian, James)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Malik Lawrence v. Loews Hollywood Hotel, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MALIK LAWRENCE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LOEWS HOLLYWOOD HOTEL, LLC
Represented By: James H Demerjian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?