Roxane Towry Russell v. Walmart Inc. et al
| Roxana Towry Russell, d/b/a Roxy Russell Design, Roxana Towry Russell and Roxana Towry Russell an individual doing business as Roxy Russell Design |
| Walmart Inc. and Wal-Mart.com USA, LLC |
| 2:2019cv05495 |
| June 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Wal-Mart.com USA, LLC answer now due 8/26/2019; Walmart Inc. answer now due 8/26/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants Wal-Mart.com USA, LLC; Walmart Inc..(Attorney Bijal V Vakil added to party Wal-Mart.com USA, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Bijal V Vakil added to party Walmart Inc.(pty:dft))(Vakil, Bijal) |
Filing 12
ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE due to self-recusal pursuant to General Order 19-03 by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Case transferred from Judge John A. Kronstadt to the calendar of Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald for all further proceedings. Case number now reads as 2:19-cv-05495 MWF (JCx). (esa)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE due to self-recusal pursuant to General Order 19-03 by Judge Percy Anderson. Case transferred from Judge Percy Anderson to the calendar of Judge John A. Kronstadt for all further proceedings. Case number now reads as 2:19-cv-05495 JAK(JCx). (rn)
|
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to defendants Wal-Mart.com USA, LLC, Walmart Inc. (mrgo) |
| Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Roxana Towry Russell. (Ruttenberg, Guy) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #3 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Roxana Towry Russell, d/b/a Roxy Russell Design, (Ruttenberg, Guy) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Roxana Towry Russell, d/b/a Roxy Russell Design. (Ruttenberg, Guy) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Roxana Towry Russell, d/b/a Roxy Russell Design. (Ruttenberg, Guy) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Roxana Towry Russell, d/b/a Roxy Russell Design. (Ruttenberg, Guy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23974019 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Roxana Towry Russell, d/b/a Roxy Russell Design. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C) (Attorney Guy Ruttenberg added to party Roxana Towry Russell, d/b/a Roxy Russell Design(pty:pla))(Ruttenberg, Guy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
