Mark Woods v. Quest Diagnostics Incorporated, et al
Mark Woods |
American Medial Collection Agency, Optum360 LLC, Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Quest Diagnostics Incorporated, Does 1 to 10, inclusive, Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc. and Quest Diagnostics Incorporated a Nevada corporation doing business as Quest Diagnostics Incorporated of Nevada |
2:2019cv05817 |
July 5, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Steve Kim |
Fernando M Olguin |
Christina A Snyder |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Justin F Marquez counsel for Plaintiff Mark Woods. Patty W. Chen is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiffs Mark Woods. (Marquez, Justin) |
Filing 23 Conditional Transfer Order - 1 from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, MDL 2904, transferring case to USDC, District of New Jersey and assigned to Honorable Madeline C. Arleo. Case transferred electronically. (iv) |
Filing 22 STATUS REPORT (Joint Status Report) filed by Defendant Optum360 LLC. (Akerman, Alexander) |
Filing 21 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS PENDING RULING ON CONSOLIDATION AND TRANSFER BY JPML #17 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court hereby GRANTS the Parties' Stipulation and ORDERS as follows: All proceedings and deadlines in this action are stayed in their entirety until seven (7) days after the JPML issues a ruling as to whether this action should be consolidated and transferred into a MDL proceeding in In re American Medical Collection Agency, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, MDL Docket No. 2904. The Parties are directed to file a status report notifying the Court of the JPML's decision within seven (7) days of the JPML's ruling. IT IS SO ORDERED.(Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lom) |
Filing 20 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Optum360 LLC, identifying Optum360 LLC, Optum Rocket, Inc., OptumInsight, Inc., OptumInsight Holdings, LLC, Optum, Inc., United HealthCare Services, Inc., UnitedHealth Group Incorporated. (Akerman, Alexander) |
Filing 19 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Optum360 LLC identifying Optum Rocket, Inc., OptumInsight, Inc., OptumInsight Holdings, LLC, Optum, Inc., United HealthCare Services, Inc., UnitedHealth Group Incorporated as Corporate Parent. (Akerman, Alexander) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Petition to the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation [Local Rule 83-1.4.3] filed by Defendant Optum360 LLC. (Akerman, Alexander) |
Filing 17 Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Ruling on Consolidation and Transfer by JPML filed by Defendant Optum360 LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Joint Stipulation for Stay of Proceedings Pending Ruling on Consolidation and Transfer by JPML)(Akerman, Alexander) |
Filing 16 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Alexander Akerman counsel for Defendant Optum360 LLC. Adding Alexander Akerman as counsel of record for Defendant Optum360 LLC for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Optum360 LLC. (Attorney Alexander Akerman added to party Optum360 LLC(pty:dft))(Akerman, Alexander) |
Filing 15 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vdr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 14 ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE due to self-recusal pursuant to General Order 19-03 by Judge Christina A. Snyder. Case transferred from Judge Christina A. Snyder to the calendar of Judge Fernando M. Olguin for all further proceedings. Case number now reads as 2:19-cv-05817 FMO(SKx). (rn) |
Filing 13 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Quest Diagnostics Incorporated. (esa) |
Filing 12 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Optum360 LLC. (esa) |
Filing 11 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Optum360 LLC. (esa) |
Filing 10 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant American Medial Collection Agency. (esa) |
Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (esa) |
Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff MARK WOODS. (Coelho, Thiago) |
Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff MARK WOODS. (Coelho, Thiago) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff MARK WOODS. (Coelho, Thiago) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff MARK WOODS, (Coelho, Thiago) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff MARK WOODS. (Coelho, Thiago) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff MARK WOODS. correcting Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Coelho, Thiago) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24038023 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff MARK WOODS. (Attorney Thiago Merlini Coelho added to party MARK WOODS(pty:pla))(Coelho, Thiago) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.